Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,335 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Recommended typeface and font #57827

    Don't upload your InDesign file! That would make it inaccessible for everyone who hasn't got your version of InDesign, or your personal custom plug-ins (if any), or your current set of fonts. Export to a PDF; and if you happened to use a lot of bitmap images, use the “Low quality for screen” preset. Then put it on an external server, such as yousendit, and post the URL in here.

    in reply to: Should I use text variables? #57826

    Use a cross-reference. Text variables pick up a text in a certain character or paragraph style (amongst other things), and you cannot use these to refer to a page — but a cross-reference can.

    The “target” for a cross-reference can be a page, but in this case you should use a text anchor, which is inserted into the text itself. If the text (to be precise, as you hopefully realize, that particular text anchor) runs onto another page, ID will update the reference to it with the new page number.

    in reply to: What takes precedence: dictionary or hjs? #57815

    .. where it does hyphenate, it will break in very odd places, not standard US english breaks ..

    First thing to check is if the langauge applied to your text is, in fact, US English. This sounds like the text is set to another language.

    in reply to: No Layer efects when export to interactive pdf #57802

    Oh wait — this message pops up for the reverse! The effects should still be there, but no buttons …

    Hmmm …

    in reply to: No Layer efects when export to interactive pdf #57801

    My CS4 always shows this warning when I try to export a document with effects and have the “Interactive” checkbox checked. That's why I never click any of the “Never Show Again” checkboxes — “I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?”

    You might have clicked the Don't Bother Me checkbox sometime long ago; but then again, it also might have changed in CS5, and it just doesn't warn you anymore.

    The dialog contains a tip on how to prevent this: try changing the Acrobat compatibility setting.

    in reply to: How to delete a corrupt style? #57788

    Can't you do anything at all with that style? Change its definition, Based On, a total redefine, etc.?

    Is it in use anywhere? (I wouldn't know if that matters, actually — but I've had ID freeze on me when I tried to delete a paragraph style that was heavily used.)

    Can you rename it? From ye olde memory: certain characters that were allowed in style names in Word caused problems in InDesign. Lots of versions ago, but you never know.

    in reply to: PrintToMemoryStream SDK Plug-In #57787

    Does that sample comes with scripting support?

    From Adobe's “Scripting Your Plug-in” PDF (*):

    ? Script provider: InDesign service provider that registers as a script service and reports the objects they support, as well as the supported events and properties on each object. It also provides an implementation to find a script object, get and set its properties, and execute its methods.

    (*) Admittedly, the one for InDesign 2.0 plugins — from 2001. But the system in general didn't change, the past decade or so, so the documentation for your current version may come with an example on how to set it up.

    in reply to: Watch out Quark! #57759

    Yeah, how did people work in InDesign 1.0 without the History Palette?

    (Oh, wait …) :D

    in reply to: Navigating multi-page doc via keyboard #57748

    Doesn't Alt+Pg Up/Down browse through spreads, rather than pages? That ought to keep both pages visible at all times.

    (And if holding down a modifier key bothers you, you can change the shortcut to use 'plain' Pg Up/Down.)

    in reply to: Bulleted Graphics with Numbers #57747

    See this thread from Adobe's InDesign forum: https://forums.adobe.com/thread…..?tstart=60

    (Tomaxxi's answer at the bottom only got a gold star, not the ribbon it deserved :( )

    in reply to: Navigating multi-page doc via keyboard #52071

    Doesn't Alt+Pg Up/Down browse through spreads, rather than pages? That ought to keep both pages visible at all times.

    (And if holding down a modifier key bothers you, you can change the shortcut to use 'plain' Pg Up/Down.)

    in reply to: necessity of downsizing images before placing #57732

    Hi David!

    My “it doesn't matter where you downsample” is based on the fact that, from the point of view of the final output, you should always supply more than enough pixels. I.e., for a 120 lpi screen show it seems you'd need no more than 150 dpi, but it's highly recommended to go no lower than 300 dpi. Surely any (un)sharpening at the individual pixel level would then be invisible?

    (Actually, this is equal to your thumbs up for JPEG. Any compression artifacts ought to be virtually invisible on high rez output — if and only if in its entire Save history only the highest possible quality was chosen.)

    in reply to: Template Layer #57727

    You cannot change the opacity of layers in InDesign, you'll have to select the objects instead, and change those.

    1 point equals .466%

    Where'd you get that from? Points are real measurement units (other than, say, hand's widths or pixels). Your conversion only works if the entire object is exactly 1/0.00466 = 214.6 points wide. Only then is 0.466% of that amount exactly 1 point.

    I'd set the measurement to points, the proxy to center, then add the stroke width to both height and width.

    in reply to: necessity of downsizing images before placing #57724

    Well, yes, yes, and yes. (I think.) The only “no” I'd suggest is on saving as JPEG. [a]

    If you reduce the size of an image in InDesign, you are automatically increasing its resolution. On exporting, InDesign may decide the resolution gets ridiculously high — default is above 450 dpi — and automatically downsample it to its default of 300 dpi. Therefore, it really doesn't matter if you downsample it yourself to 300 dpi, or let ID do it for you.

    Downsampling does “degrade” the image quality, because it needs to throw away actual data. However, if the resolution after downsampling is still sufficiently high for your intended output target (print?), the degradation is not visible at all.

    [a] Given a choice, you're better off saving as PSD. If you save as JPEG — even using the highest possible quality –, its compression introduces artifacts. That kind of artifacts is most visible when using the lowest quality (try it!), and they may very well be invisible at 300 dpi. But if you decide the image doesn't look right, open it again in PS, adjust something and save it again as JPEG, the amount of artifacts increase. Do it a couple of times, and it gets worse every time. PSD uses a lossless compressed format, so it doesn't suffer from this.

Viewing 15 posts - 706 through 720 (of 1,335 total)